<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> 
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>DistroStuff - Reviews for CentOS</title>
<link>http://www.distrostuff.com/</link>
<description>Reviews for CentOS</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2006 DistroStuff</copyright>

<item>
<title><b>CentOS</b> 5.2 review</title>
<link>http://silentcoder.co.za/silentcoder/?p=326</link>
<description>So, what with the new job at datacash being very enterprise oriented one of the distro’s I’m working on is <b>CentOS</b>. I haven’t used it before so I wanted to install it at home and get a feel for this community created enterprise class <b>...</b></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Review: <b>CentOS</b> 5</title>
<link>http://orderweb.biz/linux/linux_20070730.php#90014379</link>
<description>Raider's Realm: "Given all this versatility, and its roots as a server OS, some may be lead to ask the question, 'Does it make a good desktop distribution?' We're about...</description>
</item>
<item>
<title><b>CentOS</b> 5-beta -- First Impressions</title>
<link>http://odyssi.blogspot.com/2007/04/centos-5-beta-first-impressions.html</link>
<description>Last night, I installed the beta release of <b>CentOS</b> 5 to take it for a test drive. For those of you looking for screenshots, there are several screenshots of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5 available here. <b>...</b></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tops-Post-first look at <b>CentOS</b> 5 Xen</title>
<link>http://searchb5.topsite2007.com/Tops-Post-first-look-at-CentOS-5-Xen/</link>
<description>Then the <b>CentOS</b> 5 installation instance that runs under Xen will have to partition the disk (it doesn’t support installing directly to an unpartitioned disk) which will make things painful when it comes time to resize the filesystems. <b>...</b></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><b>CentOS</b> 5 is a solid enterprise OS (Distribution Reviews)</title>
<link>http://allhuda.blogspot.com/2007/04/centos-5-is-solid-enterprise-os.html</link>
<description>Last week, two years since its last major release, the <b>CentOS</b> project released version 5 of its enterprise-focused Linux distribution. I downloaded it and put it to the test, and found that <b>CentOS</b> 5 has maintained its tradition of <b>...</b></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><b>CentOS</b> 5 Linux is &#38;quot;rock-solid,&#38;quot; reviewer says</title>
<link>http://www.shashum.com.ar/linux-news/2007/04/centos-5-linux-is-reviewer-says.html</link>
<description><b>CentOS</b> 5.0 received high marks in one of the first reviews of its latest release. The OS, which is billed as a "100 percent compatible" rebuild of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, targets users who need enterprise-class operating system <b>...</b></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>LXer: <b>CentOS</b> 5 Linux is &#38;quot;rock-solid,&#38;quot; reviewer says</title>
<link>http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=547715&goto=newpost</link>
<description>Forum: Syndicated Linux News Posted By: LXer Post Time: 04-20-2007 at 06:31 PM.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Quick Review of Oracle on <b>CentOS</b> (RHEL) 5</title>
<link>http://seilerwerks.blogspot.com/2007/04/quick-review-of-oracle-on-centos-rhel-5.html</link>
<description>Hampus Linden, the Swedish werewolf in London, has posted a light review of Oracle  on <b>CentOS</b> 5, the latest release to match the new RedHat Enterprise Linux 5. <b>CentOS</b> is basically RHEL without the paid support, <b>...</b></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Community Preview Feedback :: RE: Scalix 11 on <b>CentOS</b> 4.3</title>
<link>http://www.scalix.com/community/viewtopic.php?p=16420#16420</link>
<description>though unsupported, I'm pretty sure that the effects that you're describing have  nothing to do with the use of <b>CentOS</b>. Can you login to SWA Mobile? If not, then  your API platform in Scalix 11 is probably not working correctly because of <b>...</b></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><b>CentOS</b> 4.3 review</title>
<link>http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=263&Itemid=81</link>
<description><b>CentOS</b> 4 is built using the same source code as the industry-leading Red Hat <b>...</b>  Released in March of this year, <b>CentOS</b> 4.3 contains all previously issued bug  <b>...</b> With the fading away of TaoLinux and White Box Linux, <b>CentOS</b> alone fills <b>...</b></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><b>CentOS</b> 4.3 Reviewed</title>
<link>http://www.osdeals.in/2006/07/centos_43_reviewed.php</link>
<description><b>CentOS</b> 4.3 has recently been independently reviewed by the Linux CD DVD Network. <b>...</b> <b>CentOS</b>  4.3 can be downloaded at: http://www.<b>centos</b>.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=15  You can also buy the CDs / DVDs at: <b>...</b></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>NewsForge | Review: <b>CentOS</b> 3.3 is a good Red Hat server alternative</title>
<link>http://linux-server-masters.com/blog/307/newsforge-review-centos-33-is-a-good-red-hat-server-alternative.html</link>
<description>NewsForge | Review: <b>CentOS</b> 3.3 is a good Red Hat server alternative Review: <b>CentOS</b>  3.3 is a good Red Hat server alternative — article related to Linux.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Review: <b>CentOS</b> 4</title>
<link>http://osdir.com/Article5467.phtml</link>
<description>Distributions like White Box Linux, Lineox Enterprise Linux, Pie Box Enterprise Linux, and <b>CentOS</b> Linux are among the many projects that seek to fill the gap between Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux. (<b>CentOS</b> 4.0 Screenshots by <b>...</b></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
